<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A simulation the size of the entire human brain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neurodudes.com/2005/12/05/a-simulation-the-size-of-the-entire-human-brain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neurodudes.com/2005/12/05/a-simulation-the-size-of-the-entire-human-brain/</link>
	<description>at the intersection of neuroscience and AI.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kai Schreiber</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2005/12/05/a-simulation-the-size-of-the-entire-human-brain/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai Schreiber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=209#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>Hm. That synaptic connection bit also means that a) his simulated brain is static and can't learn more than what sustained activity can hold in memory and b) it has some highly redundant structure allowing him to compute the weights. Both are not true for natural brains, making his estimate somewhat optimistic, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. That synaptic connection bit also means that a) his simulated brain is static and can&#8217;t learn more than what sustained activity can hold in memory and b) it has some highly redundant structure allowing him to compute the weights. Both are not true for natural brains, making his estimate somewhat optimistic, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ch</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2005/12/05/a-simulation-the-size-of-the-entire-human-brain/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>ch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=209#comment-1059</guid>
		<description>He says that "Instead of saving synaptic connections, I re-generated the anatomy every time step."  I wonder how much additional overhead this technique caused, and how much longer the simulation ran as a result.

Also, is anyone else satisfied with waiting 40 years to run these quickly?  This makes it especially clear that we'll need alternative hardware.  Good luck to Blue Brain nonetheless...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He says that &#8220;Instead of saving synaptic connections, I re-generated the anatomy every time step.&#8221;  I wonder how much additional overhead this technique caused, and how much longer the simulation ran as a result.</p>
<p>Also, is anyone else satisfied with waiting 40 years to run these quickly?  This makes it especially clear that we&#8217;ll need alternative hardware.  Good luck to Blue Brain nonetheless&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayle</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2005/12/05/a-simulation-the-size-of-the-entire-human-brain/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=209#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>Thanks to Erik Flister for telling me about this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Erik Flister for telling me about this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
