Comments on: Scholarpedia http://neurodudes.com/2006/02/15/scholarpedia/ at the intersection of neuroscience and AI. Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:39:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Neville http://neurodudes.com/2006/02/15/scholarpedia/#comment-1250 Neville Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:31:42 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/2006/02/15/scholarpedia/#comment-1250 Yeah, that does make sense... I added the comment on the discussion section of the main page. Yeah, that does make sense… I added the comment on the discussion section of the main page.

]]> By: Bayle http://neurodudes.com/2006/02/15/scholarpedia/#comment-1245 Bayle Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:15:51 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/2006/02/15/scholarpedia/#comment-1245 Neville, why don't you go over to Scholarpedia and post this as a comment there? I just posted one. I figure that a wiki founder can always use the encouragement of seeing that people are interested. Neville, why don’t you go over to Scholarpedia and post this as a comment there? I just posted one. I figure that a wiki founder can always use the encouragement of seeing that people are interested.

]]> By: Neville http://neurodudes.com/2006/02/15/scholarpedia/#comment-1237 Neville Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:13:34 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/2006/02/15/scholarpedia/#comment-1237 Awesome. Scholarpedia looks like a great idea to me. Another idea occurred to me after I took a look at the site: Given their initial "invitation-only" period, I think it might take them some time to get enough peer-reviewed contributions to really get the ball rolling. I think Eugene should start with an established body of work, something like Arbib's Encyclopedia of Brain Theory. It's only a few years out of date and has a very diverse set of contributors. It would be great if MIT Press let them put it online. A little wishful thinking... :) Awesome. Scholarpedia looks like a great idea to me. Another idea occurred to me after I took a look at the site: Given their initial “invitation-only” period, I think it might take them some time to get enough peer-reviewed contributions to really get the ball rolling. I think Eugene should start with an established body of work, something like Arbib’s Encyclopedia of Brain Theory. It’s only a few years out of date and has a very diverse set of contributors. It would be great if MIT Press let them put it online. A little wishful thinking… :)

]]>