<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curing blindness, with light-activated ion channels?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/</link>
	<description>at the intersection of neuroscience and AI.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bayle</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>in utero electroporation! wouldn't that be dangerous to the embryo?

I don't know much about the technique, but the abstract of &lt;a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0439"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; says the embryo survival rate was 90%. I expect that other 10% would generate a lot of controversy, but I also wonder if it's possible for the technique to hurt the embryo without killing it, leading to problems down the line.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in utero electroporation! wouldn&#8217;t that be dangerous to the embryo?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know much about the technique, but the abstract of <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0439">this article</a> says the embryo survival rate was 90%. I expect that other 10% would generate a lot of controversy, but I also wonder if it&#8217;s possible for the technique to hurt the embryo without killing it, leading to problems down the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>For congenital disorders, waiting until the child grows up may corrupt cortex... maybe in utero electroporation, or some well-timed gene delivery, would be a good way to go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For congenital disorders, waiting until the child grows up may corrupt cortex&#8230; maybe in utero electroporation, or some well-timed gene delivery, would be a good way to go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack Lynch</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 22:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>Nice research catch.  Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice research catch.  Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 06:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>The paper shows that channelrhodopsin is essentially safe forever. This could lead to optical prosthetics in a broader sense, driving neurons in the brain that have been infected with AAV or some other fairly safe virus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The paper shows that channelrhodopsin is essentially safe forever. This could lead to optical prosthetics in a broader sense, driving neurons in the brain that have been infected with AAV or some other fairly safe virus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biomedical student blog &#187; Bionic vision -updated</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>biomedical student blog &#187; Bionic vision -updated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: There is a brief post, made over at the neurodudes blog, on curing blindness in mice through light activated ion channels.    &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: There is a brief post, made over at the neurodudes blog, on curing blindness in mice through light activated ion channels.    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neville</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Neville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 03:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/05/curing-blindness-with-light-activated-ion-channels/#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>Hey Neurodudes, it looks like we've &lt;a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/05/2329202" rel="nofollow"&gt;made Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;. Man, channelrhodopsin is so hot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Neurodudes, it looks like we&#8217;ve <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/05/2329202" rel="nofollow">made Slashdot</a>. Man, channelrhodopsin is so hot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
