<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mountcastle/Hawkins prediction framework summary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/19/mountcastlehawkins-prediction-framework-summary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/19/mountcastlehawkins-prediction-framework-summary/</link>
	<description>at the intersection of neuroscience and AI.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Dright</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/19/mountcastlehawkins-prediction-framework-summary/#comment-2210</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2006/04/19/mountcastlehawkins-prediction-framework-summary/#comment-2210</guid>
		<description>I'm not entirely sure that this book, if accurately reviewed, will really be up my alley. It sounds as though it was written by someone who comes, as Hawkins does, from a strictly binary background. I appreciate the memory vs. computing strategy as well as the pattern recognition stuff and the heirarchical model, but there isn't much mentioned regarding distributed modeling. At least not in the article. This may be just an artifact of the reviewer, however.

Just my thoughts. A little simplistic on the reviewer's part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not entirely sure that this book, if accurately reviewed, will really be up my alley. It sounds as though it was written by someone who comes, as Hawkins does, from a strictly binary background. I appreciate the memory vs. computing strategy as well as the pattern recognition stuff and the heirarchical model, but there isn&#8217;t much mentioned regarding distributed modeling. At least not in the article. This may be just an artifact of the reviewer, however.</p>
<p>Just my thoughts. A little simplistic on the reviewer&#8217;s part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
