A New Psychology resource, community built by psychologists and trainees, to unify the body of psychology information in one place:
http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
Check it out, and if it interests you, please contribute, or review it on your blog.
Tom Michael, Mostly Zen – site admin
This entry was posted on Monday, July 31st, 2006 at 11:13 am by A Neurodudes Reader and is filed under Cognitive science, Discussion, Internet and blogs, Misc. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Additional comments powered by BackType
In Why Tononi is wrong, Sean O Nuallain PhD said:
Thanks for your comments I just published a paper in Biosemiotics that I think answers your question It’s at http://www.springerlink.com...
In Scientists use MRI to reveal the movies in our mind, brain shirts said:
The decoding work from Jack Gallant’s group at UC Berkeley coming out over the last few years has really been...
In How to prepare for a PhD in neuroscience, Eric said:
I’m sorry, but I don’t agree with the stockpiling of quantitative skills and then waltzing into neuroscience like it’s...
In Open questions in neuroscience, Marvin Jeffries said:
If your o2 drops to 60s for 2 and one half days cand that cause memory problems over 1 year later? eg. Sroppomg for green light about 200...
(under construction)
Using Yahoo Pipes, we combined neuro/ai/cog-related RSS feeds from many sources into one, sometimes filtering along the way so as to minimize offtopic posts:
Ultimate neurodudes RSS feed (relatively inclusive version)
Feeds are periodically added and subtracted, but hopefully reflects the blogrolls below (but doesn't yet -- it's still under construction), except for those feeds which Yahoo Pipes had trouble processing, a list of which can be seen by checking the Pipe page.
Bayle's working on Google Reader bundles for neuroscience journals, and other neuro feeds. Like the Ultimate Neurodudes Feed, these are heavily under construction, and probably aren't very good yet.
Here's a neurodudes' friend feed on Twitter, which follows a bunch of people who often post interesting material.
See our links page.
neurodudes (since 2000) | contact us
proudly powered by WordPress | Feeds: entries (RSS)
and comments (RSS)
July 31st, 2006 at 8:57 pm
Out of curiosity: what is the advantage of removing it from being a subset of wikipedia itself? It seems that the ability to cross link psychology articles with other relevant disciplines — neuroscience, anatomy, psychiatry, medical devices, scanners, etc. — could be very valuable.
August 5th, 2006 at 9:53 pm
The reason for bringing the material together outside of Wikipedia is to focus on an attempt to develop the material to a formal academic standard, drawing together all the references in the field and linking to full text where possible. This level of knowledge management and integration is beyond the encyclopedic aims of WP. Obviously your point about integration across disciplines is relevant and as you will see from the anatomy and genetics areas we hope to cover them in some detail too.We feel that WP is aimed more for the intelligent general reader. This is more an academic site with academic values, although we do hope that it will be accessible to interested parties, particularly the users of our services.