Comments on: Special Computational Neuroscience Issue of Science http://neurodudes.com/2006/10/09/special-computational-neuroscience-issue-of-science/ at the intersection of neuroscience and AI. Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:47:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Peter http://neurodudes.com/2006/10/09/special-computational-neuroscience-issue-of-science/#comment-17454 Peter Sat, 11 Nov 2006 03:33:12 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/?p=331#comment-17454 O'Reilly's work is really crap, folks. His models are so underconstrained that he is merely telling a story which fits a few anecdotes of data. O’Reilly’s work is really crap, folks.
His models are so underconstrained that he is merely telling a story which fits a few anecdotes of data.

]]> By: Chris http://neurodudes.com/2006/10/09/special-computational-neuroscience-issue-of-science/#comment-12029 Chris Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:33:42 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/?p=331#comment-12029 Yeah, I think the articles are quite good (particularly Randy's, though of I'm a little biased). I am also really interested in the Rhythms of the Brain book by Buzsaki, reviewed in this issue. I was surprised by the article suggesting that there are an abundance of job opportunities in the area, though. Has that been your perception as well? Yeah, I think the articles are quite good (particularly Randy’s, though of I’m a little biased). I am also really interested in the Rhythms of the Brain book by Buzsaki, reviewed in this issue.

I was surprised by the article suggesting that there are an abundance of job opportunities in the area, though. Has that been your perception as well?

]]> By: Yama http://neurodudes.com/2006/10/09/special-computational-neuroscience-issue-of-science/#comment-11955 Yama Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:25:58 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/?p=331#comment-11955 This is so exciting! This is so exciting!

]]>