<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cautionary note on FRET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neurodudes.com/2007/02/21/cautionary-note-on-fret/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/02/21/cautionary-note-on-fret/</link>
	<description>at the intersection of neuroscience and AI.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Hires</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/02/21/cautionary-note-on-fret/comment-page-1/#comment-47050</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2007/02/21/cautionary-note-on-fret/#comment-47050</guid>
		<description>While I was at first quite skeptical of the reported results, my attitude has changed after trying to replicate their results.  Applying ATP to purified GluSnFR gave very similar quenching effects.  The authors of this study may be onto something significant.  Or we all could be missing an obscure artifact. For a more complete breakdown of the paper and to see some new data supporting their results, check out my &lt;a href=&quot;http://brainwindows.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/atp-and-fret-a-cautionary-note-confirmed/&quot;&gt;weblog post&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I was at first quite skeptical of the reported results, my attitude has changed after trying to replicate their results.  Applying ATP to purified GluSnFR gave very similar quenching effects.  The authors of this study may be onto something significant.  Or we all could be missing an obscure artifact. For a more complete breakdown of the paper and to see some new data supporting their results, check out my <a href="http://brainwindows.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/atp-and-fret-a-cautionary-note-confirmed/">weblog post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain Windows</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/02/21/cautionary-note-on-fret/comment-page-1/#comment-47044</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain Windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2007/02/21/cautionary-note-on-fret/#comment-47044</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ATP and FRET - A cautionary note,&#160;confirmed?&lt;/strong&gt;

In the February issue of Nature Biotechnology, a correspondence piece noted some very surprising findings regarding the sensitivity of genetically-encoded fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) indicators to adenosine triphosphate.  
During the ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ATP and FRET &#8211; A cautionary note,&nbsp;confirmed?</strong></p>
<p>In the February issue of Nature Biotechnology, a correspondence piece noted some very surprising findings regarding the sensitivity of genetically-encoded fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) indicators to adenosine triphosphate.<br />
During the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
