Comments on: OpenViBE http://neurodudes.com/2007/03/27/openvibe/ at the intersection of neuroscience and AI. Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:33:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: all iternal http://neurodudes.com/2007/03/27/openvibe/#comment-589341 all iternal Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:54:14 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/?p=379#comment-589341 <strong>All Internal</strong> all internal All Internal

all internal

]]> By: backseat bangers backseatbangers http://neurodudes.com/2007/03/27/openvibe/#comment-583506 backseat bangers backseatbangers Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:42:20 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/?p=379#comment-583506 <strong>backseat bangers backseatbangers</strong> hottest backseat bangers backseatbangers backseat bangers backseatbangers

hottest backseat bangers backseatbangers

]]> By: Marco Congedo http://neurodudes.com/2007/03/27/openvibe/#comment-533677 Marco Congedo Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:15:45 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/?p=379#comment-533677 Hello, the first version of Open-ViBE will be available in 2008. Right now development is very active. The platform will be free. Best, Marco Congedo Hello,

the first version of Open-ViBE will be available in 2008. Right now development is very active. The platform will be free.
Best,
Marco Congedo

]]> By: Rolando grave http://neurodudes.com/2007/03/27/openvibe/#comment-510274 Rolando grave Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:11:55 +0000 http://neurodudes.com/?p=379#comment-510274 very interesting but where is it? is it a really open or its an appendix of LORETA software? Are you aware that the so called main properties of LORETA are not true? Do you know that zero dipole localization error is just a trivial (and useless) property?. Are you aware that DLE is by no means the most natural way to evaluate linear inverse solutions? Are you aware that in contrast to sLORETA that fails to localize in presence of low noise there are inverse solutions that needs no regularization? To learn more about all these aspects check http://www.electrical-neuroimaging.ch/faq.html#etcetereta Have you noted that the head model used in LORETA software only uses "some points" in the brain volume. For an applications uisng almost the double of solution points (4024) see previous site. very interesting but where is it?
is it a really open or its an appendix of LORETA software?
Are you aware that the so called main properties of LORETA are not true?
Do you know that zero dipole localization error is just a trivial (and useless) property?.
Are you aware that DLE is by no means the most natural way to evaluate linear inverse solutions?
Are you aware that in contrast to sLORETA that fails to localize in presence of low noise there are inverse solutions that needs no regularization?
To learn more about all these aspects check http://www.electrical-neuroimaging.ch/faq.html#etcetereta
Have you noted that the head model used in LORETA software only uses “some points” in the brain volume. For an applications uisng almost the double of solution points (4024) see previous site.

]]>