<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bilaterally symmetrical animals share a common ancestor with a CNS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neurodudes.com/2007/07/17/bilaterally-symmetrical-animals-share-a-common-ancestor-with-a-cns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/07/17/bilaterally-symmetrical-animals-share-a-common-ancestor-with-a-cns/</link>
	<description>at the intersection of neuroscience and AI.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bayle</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/07/17/bilaterally-symmetrical-animals-share-a-common-ancestor-with-a-cns/#comment-311471</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=401#comment-311471</guid>
		<description>Yeah but the question is, did the common ancestor have a CENTRALIZED nervous system?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but the question is, did the common ancestor have a CENTRALIZED nervous system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mt</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/07/17/bilaterally-symmetrical-animals-share-a-common-ancestor-with-a-cns/#comment-311194</link>
		<dc:creator>mt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=401#comment-311194</guid>
		<description>This seems like a no brainer...so to speak. Bilateralizing came about from duplicating, which implies two parallel nervous systems, which equals in toto one non-centralized nervous system. QED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a no brainer&#8230;so to speak. Bilateralizing came about from duplicating, which implies two parallel nervous systems, which equals in toto one non-centralized nervous system. QED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayle</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/07/17/bilaterally-symmetrical-animals-share-a-common-ancestor-with-a-cns/#comment-285575</link>
		<dc:creator>Bayle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=401#comment-285575</guid>
		<description>Thanks, that's neat! I added a link to http://other95.blogspot.com/2007/07/cnidarian-double-whammy-anemone-genome.html in the story above (around 'have evolved relatively “more”')</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, that&#8217;s neat! I added a link to <a href="http://other95.blogspot.com/2007/07/cnidarian-double-whammy-anemone-genome.html" rel="nofollow">http://other95.blogspot.com/2007/07/cnidarian-double-whammy-anemone-genome.html</a> in the story above (around &#8216;have evolved relatively “more”&#8217;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Z</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/07/17/bilaterally-symmetrical-animals-share-a-common-ancestor-with-a-cns/#comment-285565</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=401#comment-285565</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking to my post! I learned from reading another recent paper on the cnidarian genome (that I posted on here: http://other95.blogspot.com/2007/07/cnidarian-double-whammy-anemone-genome.html) that fly and nematode evolve at a faster rate relative to the genomes of other model organisms and they a greater percentage of intron loss and ancestral gene loss. Perhaps the annelids are more conserved and evolve relatively slowly. I know that both insects and nematodes are very diverse taxa relative to chordates and annelids (and cnidarians for that matter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking to my post! I learned from reading another recent paper on the cnidarian genome (that I posted on here: <a href="http://other95.blogspot.com/2007/07/cnidarian-double-whammy-anemone-genome.html" rel="nofollow">http://other95.blogspot.com/2007/07/cnidarian-double-whammy-anemone-genome.html</a>) that fly and nematode evolve at a faster rate relative to the genomes of other model organisms and they a greater percentage of intron loss and ancestral gene loss. Perhaps the annelids are more conserved and evolve relatively slowly. I know that both insects and nematodes are very diverse taxa relative to chordates and annelids (and cnidarians for that matter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
