neurodudes » Blog Archive » Determining research trends from Neuroscience abstracts

Determining research trends from Neuroscience abstracts

Posted by A Neurodudes Reader at 12:18 AM EST

In this paper at arXiv, Yin et al. report on an analysis of the abstracts from the SfN meetings from 2001 to 2006. It sounds like their analysis uncovered several interesting trends: Two they mention in their abstract are that 60% of authors appear in only one year’s abstracts over the studied period, and that systems neuroscience seems to be on the rise relative to cellular and molecular neuroscience.

-John O’Leary

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 at 12:18 am by A Neurodudes Reader and is filed under Conferences, Social networks and organizations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType

Feeds are periodically added and subtracted, but hopefully reflects the blogrolls below (but doesn't yet -- it's still under construction), except for those feeds which Yahoo Pipes had trouble processing, a list of which can be seen by checking the Pipe page.

Bayle's working on Google Reader bundles for neuroscience journals, and other neuro feeds. Like the Ultimate Neurodudes Feed, these are heavily under construction, and probably aren't very good yet.

Here's a neurodudes' friend feed on Twitter, which follows a bunch of people who often post interesting material.

more

See our links page.

nd categories

Artificial intelligence (50)
- Robotics (21)
At the scale of cells and synapses (87)
- Computation within single neurons (21)
- Genetics and molecular (52)
- Ion channels (22)
- Neuronal arbors/neurites (18)
  - Axons (7)
  - Dendrites (11)
  - Synapses (1)
At the scale of one or more individuals (63)
- Animal cognition (19)
- Evolution (28)
- Neuroeconomics (9)
- Neuroethics (8)
- Neuroethology (16)
At the scale of systems and functions (152)
- Connectivity (1)
- Cortex (10)
- Memory and learning (55)
  - Cellular learning (13)
  - Learning theory (11)
  - Memory systems (32)
- Motor systems (14)
- Pathologies (5)
- Rhythms and oscillations (2)
- Sleep (11)
- Vision (19)
Cognitive science (84)
- Consciousness / NCC (20)
- Language (16)
Computational neuroscience (77)
- Data analysis (7)
- Neural network models (31)
Development and healing (25)
- Neural development (12)
- Neural regeneration/neurogenesis (16)
- Neuroanatomy (4)
Fun (1)
Interdisciplinary concepts (38)
- Biological computation (in non-neural systems) (13)
- Distributed/Parallel Computation (8)
- Networks (12)
  - Social networks and organizations (10)
- Probabilistic models (6)
Medicine and other intervention/augmentation (106)
- Brain-machine interfaces (47)
  - Neural prosthetics (26)
- Consumer neurotechnology (2)
- Medicine (34)
- Neuroengineering (8)
- Neuropharmacology (32)
  - neuropharmacology-comments-excluded-from-frontpage (2)
Methods and techniques (103)
- Biophysics (15)
- Culture (in vitro) (15)
- Genetic (4)
- Imaging (29)
- Multi-electode arrays (14)
- Software and online tools (8)
Misc (50)
- Uncategorized (18)
Neurodudes (meta) (6)
News, conferences, books, jobs, etc (118)
- Book review (7)
- Business (7)
- Cog/neuro science careers (26)
- Conferences (43)
- Education (21)
- Grants (6)
- Internet and blogs (24)
- Jobs (2)
Secondary post categories (42)
- Discussion (34)
- Policy (2)
- Review article (7)
Systems biology (5)
Theory/Philosophy (17)

contact us

Neurodudes is moderated by Neville Sanjana, Bayle Shanks, and Stephen Larson. Comments that you post might be delayed so that we can tell our software that it's not spam -- however, not all comments are pre-screened so don't assume that we have read them, either. Any money we make off this site is used to pay for hosting, or given to charity; if in the future we pay contributors, we will include reader-authors. None of us are medical doctors so please don't ask for medical advice. Contact us here.

wordpress counter