<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>neurodudes &#187; A Neurodudes Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neurodudes.com/author/anonymous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neurodudes.com</link>
	<description>at the intersection of neuroscience and AI.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:34:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Tononi is wrong</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2010/09/26/why-tononi-is-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2010/09/26/why-tononi-is-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognitive science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tononi consciousness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=4229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent NY Times article, Tononi chooses to propose a rather sketchily-described “Shannon informational” model to supplant a gamma synchrony model partly on these grounds; “Dr. Tononi sees serious problems in these models. When people lose consciousness from epileptic seizures, for instance, their brain waves become more synchronized. If synchronization were the key to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent NY Times article, Tononi chooses to propose a rather sketchily-described “Shannon informational” model to supplant a gamma synchrony model partly on these grounds; </p>
<p>“Dr. Tononi sees serious problems in these models. When people lose consciousness from epileptic seizures, for instance, their brain waves become more synchronized. If synchronization were the key to consciousness, you would expect the seizures to make people hyperconscious instead of unconscious, he said. “</p>
<p>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/21/science/21consciousness.html?_r=1</p>
<p><span id="more-4229"></span></p>
<p>Jouny et al (2010) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19910249 surely should have suggested that this is premature closure, with an INCREASE in signal complexity – that is, decline in synchrony – associated with seizure</p>
<p>Our study of ECOG data (electrodes directly  attached to the cortex, not on the scalp) confirms this. Sleep signal is least complex/disordered under PCA, first component explains 97%, awake is next, with 93% explained by the first component, while seizure has just 63% explained by first component. </p>
<p>Sean O Nuallain PhD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2010/09/26/why-tononi-is-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Will We Be Able to Build Brains Like Ours?</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2010/05/10/when-will-we-be-able-to-build-brains-like-ours/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2010/05/10/when-will-we-be-able-to-build-brains-like-ours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computational neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=1216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Will We Be Able to Build Brains Like Ours? – by Terry Sejnowski – scientificamerican.com Terry Sejnowski discusses the recent &#8216;catfight&#8217; that erupted between Dharmenda Modha of IBM and Henry Markram of the EPFL over claims from Modha that his group had successfully modeled the brain of a cat. Dr. Sejnowski provides a summary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=when-build-brains-like-ours#">When Will We Be Able to Build Brains Like Ours? – by Terry Sejnowski – scientificamerican.com</a></p>
<p>Terry Sejnowski discusses the recent &#8216;catfight&#8217; that erupted between <a href="http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/dmodha/">Dharmenda Modha of IBM</a> and <a href="http://people.epfl.ch/henry.markram">Henry Markram of the EPFL</a> over claims from Modha that his group had successfully modeled the brain of a cat.</p>
<p>Dr. Sejnowski provides a summary of the quest to describe the nervous system using computational models and introduces a central question: What level of abstraction is appropriate?</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Looking at the same neuron, physicists and engineers tend to see the simplicity whereas biologists tend to see the complexity.  The problem with simplified models is that they may be throwing away the baby with the bathwater.  The problem with biophysical models is that the number of details is nearly infinite and much of it is unknown. How much brain function is lost by using simplified neurons and circuits?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Despite the differing approaches, both Modha and Markram say we&#8217;ll have a model human brain by 2019. Sejnowski claims that these will be impoverished brain models, &#8220;at best these simulations will resemble a baby brain, or perhaps a psychotic one&#8221;, but he does remain hopeful in his closing remarks:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;And gradually, as it increasingly mimics the workings of our brains, the world around us will become smarter and more efficient.  As this cognitive infrastructure evolves, it may someday even reach a point where it will rival our brains in power and sophistication.  Intelligence will inherit the earth.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Submitted By: Dan Knudsen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2010/05/10/when-will-we-be-able-to-build-brains-like-ours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does it really mean to be &#8220;smart?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2010/04/06/what-does-it-really-mean-to-be-smart/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2010/04/06/what-does-it-really-mean-to-be-smart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memory and learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News, conferences, books, jobs, etc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN News ran a segment last month on the meaning and impact of intelligence on a person&#8217;s life, as measured through a test such as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale which gives an &#8220;IQ.&#8221; Dr. John Gabrieli of MIT displays brain scans that  show functional differences between brains of low IQ and high IQ subjects [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN News ran a segment last month on the meaning and impact of intelligence on a person&#8217;s life, as measured through a test such as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale which gives an &#8220;IQ.&#8221; Dr. John Gabrieli of MIT displays brain scans that  show functional differences between brains of low IQ and high IQ subjects while completing intelligence tests in an MRI scanner. The higher IQ brain shows less activity than the lower IQ brain during the same task, indicating that smarter brains are more efficient.</p>
<p>The findings on IQ mentioned in the report are remarkable. The standing debate on the importance of IQ is also on display here. Researchers have found that 25% of what makes one successful can be attributed to IQ -but Dr. Gabrieli points to findings that increases in IQ are linked to &#8220;a better paying job, a healthy future, more stability in your family life.&#8221; This makes the prospect of &#8220;training intelligence&#8221; to increase IQ scores all the more alluring and relevant. A demonstration of a computer working memory task that is used to &#8220;train intelligence&#8221; is featured in the segment.</p>
<p>Watch the segment here:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cnn.com/video/?/video/health/2010/03/22/am.cho.intelligence.part1.cnn" target="_blank">http://cnn.com/video/?/video/health/2010/03/22/am.cho.intelligence.part1.cnn</a></p>
<p>Read more about the working memory task featured in the segment:</p>
<p>http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2008/04/25/0801268105.abstract</p>
<p>-A Neurodudes Reader</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2010/04/06/what-does-it-really-mean-to-be-smart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conference on Neuroprosthetic Devices</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2009/02/10/conference-on-neuroprosthetic-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2009/02/10/conference-on-neuroprosthetic-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neural prosthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroengineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Brain Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroprosthetic Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinal Cord Stimulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2009/02/10/conference-on-neuroprosthetic-devices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The First International Conference on Neuroprosthetic Devices will take place at National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan on March 19th and 20th, 2009. The mission of this newly founded conference is to foster West-East interaction and collaboration in the rapidly advancing clinical use of neuroprosthetics. The specific aim of the first conference is to expose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.bsrc.nctu.edu.tw/ICND/">First International Conference on Neuroprosthetic Devices</a> will take place at National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan on March 19th and 20th, 2009. The mission of this newly founded conference is to foster West-East interaction and collaboration in the rapidly advancing clinical use of neuroprosthetics. The specific aim of the first conference is to expose unique technological and neurological research opportunities in Taiwan. National Chaio Tung University is one of the best universities in Taiwan and is located right next to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hsinchu_Science_Park">the world-famous HsinChu Science Park</a> hosting hundreds of biotechnology, semiconductor, and electronics companies.</p>
<p>The conference sessions will cover several key areas in the neuroprosthetic development, such as deep brain stimulation for treatment of Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy, devices for restoring hearing and overcoming muscle paralysis, microelectrode biocompatibility, and novel microelectrode technologies. For detailed conference program and registration information, please visit <a href="http://www.bsrc.nctu.edu.tw/ICND/">http://www.bsrc.nctu.edu.tw/ICND/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2009/02/10/conference-on-neuroprosthetic-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEG/MEG-neuroimaging algorithm: eLORETA</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/10/27/eegmeg-neuroimaging-technical-report-eloreta/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2007/10/27/eegmeg-neuroimaging-technical-report-eloreta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biophysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain-machine interfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methods and techniques]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2007/10/27/eegmeg-neuroimaging-technical-report-eloreta/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pascual-Marqui has posted a <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3341">preprint</a> and would like comments. Read on for the abstract.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pascual-Marqui has posted a <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3341">preprint</a> and would like comments. Read on for details.</p>
<p><span id="more-429"></span></p>
<p>A technical report with some results in the field of<br />
EEG/MEG-neuroimaging (including eLORETA) can be downloaded from:</p>
<p>http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3341</p>
<p>Title and abstract are included below.<br />
I hope by mid-November-2007 to have the software available (free,<br />
academic, public domain, as usual).<br />
Feedback would be greatly appreciated!<br />
Cordially,<br />
Roberto</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
R.D. Pascual-Marqui<br />
The KEY Institute for Brain-Mind Research<br />
University Hospital of Psychiatry<br />
pascualm at key.uzh.ch<br />
www.keyinst.uzh.ch/loreta<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Discrete, 3D distributed, linear imaging methods of electric neuronal<br />
activity. Part 1: exact, zero error localization</p>
<p>Abstract: This paper deals with the EEG/MEG neuroimaging problem:<br />
given measurements of scalp electric potential differences (EEG:<br />
electroencephalogram) and extracranial magnetic fields (MEG:<br />
magnetoencephalogram), find the 3D distribution of the generating<br />
electric neuronal activity. This problem has no unique solution. Only<br />
particular solutions with &#8220;good&#8221; localization properties are of<br />
interest, since neuroimaging is concerned with the localization of<br />
brain function. In this paper, a general family of linear imaging<br />
methods with exact, zero error localization to point-test sources is<br />
presented. One particular member of this family is sLORETA. It is<br />
shown here that sLORETA has no localization bias in the presence of<br />
measurement and biological noise. Another member of this family,<br />
denoted as eLORETA (exact low resolution brain electromagnetic<br />
tomography), is a genuine inverse solution (not merely a linear<br />
imaging method) with exact, zero error localization in the presence of<br />
measurement and structured biological noise. The general family of<br />
imaging methods is further extended to include data-dependent<br />
(adaptive) quasi-linear imaging methods, also with the exact, zero<br />
error localization property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2007/10/27/eegmeg-neuroimaging-technical-report-eloreta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Determining research trends from Neuroscience abstracts</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/10/17/determining-research-trends-from-neuroscience-abstracts/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2007/10/17/determining-research-trends-from-neuroscience-abstracts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks and organizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2007/10/17/determining-research-trends-from-neuroscience-abstracts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this paper at arXiv, Yin et al. report on an analysis of the abstracts from the SfN meetings from 2001 to 2006. It sounds like their analysis uncovered several interesting trends: Two they mention in their abstract are that 60% of authors appear in only one year&#8217;s abstracts over the studied period, and that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.2523">this paper</a> at arXiv, Yin et al. report on an analysis of the abstracts from the SfN meetings from 2001 to 2006.  It sounds like their analysis uncovered several interesting trends: Two they mention in their abstract are that 60% of authors appear in only one year&#8217;s abstracts over the studied period, and that systems neuroscience seems to be on the rise relative to cellular and molecular neuroscience.</p>
<p>-John O&#8217;Leary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2007/10/17/determining-research-trends-from-neuroscience-abstracts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad-ass squirrels</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/24/bad-ass-squirrels/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/24/bad-ass-squirrels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/24/bad-ass-squirrels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the new issue of PNAS, a totally awesome discovery about an infrared inter-species signalling system: Ground squirrels not only heat up their tails to deter snake attacks &#8212; but they also seem to use the strategy selectively against infrared-sensitive snakes &#8212; leading us to the ultimate conclusion that when the bees are gone, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the new issue of PNAS, <a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0702599104v1?etoc">a totally awesome discovery about an infrared inter-species signalling system</a>:</p>
<p>Ground squirrels not only heat up their tails to deter snake attacks &#8212; <em>but they also seem to use the strategy selectively against infrared-sensitive snakes</em> &#8212; leading us to the ultimate conclusion that when the bees are gone, the squirrels will inherit the earth&#8230; </p>
<p>You can check out an infrared-eye-view of squirrel/snake battles <a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0702599104/DC1">here</a> because I don&#8217;t know how to post movies on the internet yet</p>
<p>&#8211;Davie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/24/bad-ass-squirrels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SciVee provides video supplements for academic publications</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/19/scivee-provides-video-supplements-for-academic-publications/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/19/scivee-provides-video-supplements-for-academic-publications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The supercomputer center in San Diego has created a cool site called SciVee for scientists to upload brief videos introducing/explaining their publications. There is quite some variety in the style of these short lectures (even though there are only a few currently posted). Some give a list of the key findings of the publications and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The supercomputer center in San Diego has created a cool site called <a href="http://www.scivee.tv/">SciVee </a>for scientists to upload brief videos introducing/explaining their publications.</p>
<p>There is quite some variety in the style of these short lectures (even though there are only a few currently posted).  Some give a list of the key findings of the publications and others doing a much better job of making their work more accessible by providing an introduction/context and avoiding technical jargon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/19/scivee-provides-video-supplements-for-academic-publications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYTimes article on light-triggered stimulation</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/14/nytimes-article-on-light-triggered-stimulation/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/14/nytimes-article-on-light-triggered-stimulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Genetics and molecular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methods and techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/14/nytimes-article-on-light-triggered-stimulation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;It sounds like a science-fiction version of stupid pet tricks: by toggling a light switch, neuroscientists can set fruit flies a-leaping and mice a-twirling and stop worms in their squiggling tracks. But such feats, unveiled in the past two years, are proof that a new generation of genetic and optical technology can give researchers unprecedented [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It sounds like a science-fiction version of stupid pet tricks: by toggling a light switch, neuroscientists can set fruit flies a-leaping and mice a-twirling and stop worms in their squiggling tracks. But such feats, unveiled in the past two years, are proof that a new generation of genetic and optical technology can give researchers unprecedented power to turn on and off targeted sets of cells in the brain, and to do so by remote control&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Reviews the use of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/science/14brai.html?ex=1344744000&#038;en=0d15d7c890334419&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss">photosensitive proteins in neuroscience</a> and even gives a shout-out to <a href="http://edboyden.org/">Ed Boyden</a>, of Stanford and MIT fame&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8211; Davie (who had the same advisor as Ed for about a day and is therefore 0.01% more famous by association)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2007/08/14/nytimes-article-on-light-triggered-stimulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Age-dependent brainwashing in bees</title>
		<link>http://neurodudes.com/2007/07/23/age-dependent-brainwashing-in-bees/</link>
		<comments>http://neurodudes.com/2007/07/23/age-dependent-brainwashing-in-bees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Neurodudes Reader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroethology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks and organizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neurodudes.com/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, when not busy blowing our minds, bees occupy themselves by&#8230; &#8230;brainwashing their youth Vergoz et al, 2007, Science commentary &#8230;and/or mysteriously disappearing from the face of the earth Colony Collapse Disorder Keeping an eye on species poised to take over the world, Davie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, when not busy <a href="http://neurodudes.com/2005/12/13/bees-recognize-human-faces/">blowing our minds</a>, bees occupy themselves by&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;brainwashing their youth</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/317/5836/384">Vergoz et al, 2007, Science</a>
        </li>
<li><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/317/5836/326">commentary</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8230;and/or mysteriously disappearing from the face of the earth</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_Collapse_Disorder">Colony Collapse Disorder</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Keeping an eye on species poised to take over the world,<br />
Davie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neurodudes.com/2007/07/23/age-dependent-brainwashing-in-bees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

